OCDE, 22 mars 2007 - Voici un article intéressant de Louis Bouchez and Alexander Karpf sur le thème de la qualité du droit des sociétés et le rôle du juge au regard de la corporate governance.
Pour vous donner un aperçu du contenu de cet article, l'introduction mérite d'être envisagée : « Corporate governance is fairly new as a public policy area, and experience with how to best design, implement and evaluate the regulatory framework is still limited. This also applies to corporate governance related dispute resolution. Corporate governance related dispute resolution covers those disputes that involve shareholders on the one hand, and the various company organs typically the board and the executive management on the other hand. Policymakers should consider what market participants request from dispute resolution mechanisms. Moreover, policymakers need information about the available range of different dispute resolution mechanisms, their respective pros and cons, and how they can complement each other in serving market participants. There is a demand from policymakers for a perspective on rules and practices, for them to understand the relative costs and benefits of different policy options, as well as to identify, assess, promote or re-direct existing policies in the field of corporate governance related dispute resolution. This paper reports on the OECD work programme in the field of corporate governance and dispute resolution. Part I describes the background to the programme and Part II contains the synthesis note of a recent expert meeting which focused on specialized courts and arbitration as alternative mechanisms for resolution of corporate governance related disputes ».
Pour vous donner un aperçu du contenu de cet article, l'introduction mérite d'être envisagée : « Corporate governance is fairly new as a public policy area, and experience with how to best design, implement and evaluate the regulatory framework is still limited. This also applies to corporate governance related dispute resolution. Corporate governance related dispute resolution covers those disputes that involve shareholders on the one hand, and the various company organs typically the board and the executive management on the other hand. Policymakers should consider what market participants request from dispute resolution mechanisms. Moreover, policymakers need information about the available range of different dispute resolution mechanisms, their respective pros and cons, and how they can complement each other in serving market participants. There is a demand from policymakers for a perspective on rules and practices, for them to understand the relative costs and benefits of different policy options, as well as to identify, assess, promote or re-direct existing policies in the field of corporate governance related dispute resolution. This paper reports on the OECD work programme in the field of corporate governance and dispute resolution. Part I describes the background to the programme and Part II contains the synthesis note of a recent expert meeting which focused on specialized courts and arbitration as alternative mechanisms for resolution of corporate governance related disputes ».
A découvrir en cliquant
Je signale également que sur la même thématique, l'OCDE a publié ces travaux résultant d'un metting à Stokholm qui a eu lieu en mars 2006 : « Corporate Governance Related Disputes ».
- Session I : Setting the scope of the topic - The Public Policy Perspective
- Session II : Corporate Governance and Dispute Resolution - the role of specialised courts in settling corporate governance disputes
- Session III : Corporate Governance and Dispute Resolution – the role of arbitration in settling corporate governance disputes
- Session IV : Specialised Courts or Arbitration? Trade-offs for the Resolution of Corporate Governance Related Disputes
Pour plus de détails, il suffit de se rendre sur la page de l'OCDE en cliquant ici
A la prochaine ...
Aucun commentaire:
Publier un commentaire