Consulter cet article (en anglais) en un clic
A la prochaine ...
On July 27, 2007, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) released a document that sets out possible changes to the way that non-binding shareholder proposals are dealt with at U.S. companies. One suggestion floated in the document is that shareholders be required to hold a larger stake in a company in order to make a non-binding proposal. The SEC Release also sets out possible ways that its procedures for proposals could be completely overridden and replaced by rules and procedures set out in a company’s bylaws.
Increasing the threshold for making a proposal from its current level of 1% of shares or shares with a market value of $2,000 would clearly reduce shareholder opportunities to participate in a company’s future development. The suggestion that the SEC pull away from the process and leave companies and shareholders to work out the rules that would apply amongst themselves could shut shareholders out altogether.Under the current system, SEC Rule 14(a)-8 sets out the acceptable subjects for shareholder proposals. If a company receives a proposal that it believes is unacceptable under the SEC Rule, it appeals to the SEC and asks its staff to evaluate the proposal in light of the Rule. The SEC then makes a decision about the acceptability of the proposal. Barring the unusual step of appeal to the courts by the unsuccessful party, the proposal either goes on the ballot for the next company meeting to be voted on by all shareholders or it does not—as per the SEC staff decision. It is this regime that is currently being re-examined by the SEC, spurred by comments from those with a clear interest in limiting the voice of shareholders in the future course of corporate conduct.